Fudging Climate Science

Join our supporters! and Check our twitter account

James Delingpole should be understood to be of the same ilk as Chris Monkton (not a lord if you thought so). There are a million ways to win an argument using retoric tricks, like James in below video to deny climate science is about consensus. That is correct, science is not about consensus, but what the reporter means is that while striving to check and refute or find other reasons for the results, the conslusion is the largely and uniformly same. So there is a consensus about the accuracy of the scientific results. James explains he is an ‘interpreter of interpretations’..I’d call him a liar and a bullshitter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *